You’ve Got a Post! An Email Framework for Student Discussion Posts in the Online Classroom

Credit: iStock.com/fatido
Credit: iStock.com/fatido

Online faculty often default to an essay assignment mindset when establishing the parameters for an online discussion. They require posts to be up to 500 words and to include several citations and other academic writing components, such as introductions, conclusions, and references.

But online discussion is not an essay exchange or a place to practice academic writing. It is a “discussion”: a forum for students to practice effective communication with peers and build on each other’s ideas and for teachers to foster student engagement in the online classroom. An academic writing format does not facilitate this type of exchange.

Just looking at an essay-length post on a discussion board is intimating. Large chunks of text are difficult to engage with, resulting in cognitive overload for students. And essays contain too many different ideas for students to respond to effectively. This can result in a glut of fragmented and superficial responses on a discussion board.

In the working world, we discuss issues online in emails, and email has its own format. Students learn the academic article format in higher education and texting format outside of class, but rarely are they taught the email format that will serve as the basis for their online discussions in the future. We serve our students better by leaving the academic format to essay assignments and instead teaching them to communicate using the email format in online discussion.

Effective emails focus on one topic, open with the main idea, and are designed to be read and responded to efficiently while also building rapport with their audience—all elements that can facilitate a more engaging and accessible online student discussion.

Thus, I decided to experiment with having students write in an email format for their online discussions. Adapted from Guffey et al.’s Essentials of Business Communication (2016), I now use the following email framework to guide students’ discussion posts in the online classroom:

  • Subject line:
    • The subject line is a summary of the main message of the post.
    • Headline style (i.e., abbreviated, no punctuation needed, all words but the articles and prepositions capitalized).
    • This should be written last, after the post has been composed.
  • Salutation:
    • A polite greeting, such as “Hello” or “Hi.”
    • Address the group with “Hello everyone” or the individual you are replying to by name.
  • Opening:
    • An expansion of the subject line.
    • Use the direct writing approach and the active voice.
    • Front-load the information that you want to share.
  • Body:
    • Build on your opening with details in the body.
    • One topic per post.
    • Use high-skim or easily read features—including short paragraphs, headings, white space, and bulleted and numbered lists—to make posts easier to engage with.
  • Closing:
    • End with a closing idea or question to facilitate further discussion.
    • Sign off politely.
  • Length: Approximately 100–200 words.
  • Tone: Informal but respectful.

Although further research needs be undertaken to support the efficacy of this framework, the result in my classroom been accessible discussions, high student engagement, and an opportunity to practice professional writing in a low-stakes environment.

Clear, concise, and respectful communication will always be a transferable skill for students, and what is most important is articulating those expectations to your class. Modeling and normalizing email-style exchanges on a discussion board can help create a more accessible forum for your online classroom while facilitating literacy practices that will not only follow students through their academic journey but also support them throughout their professional lives.

Reference

Guffey, M. E., Loewy, D., & Almonte, R. (2016). Essentials of business communication (9th Canadian ed.). Nelson Education.


Casey Gurfinkel is a communications professor in the Department of English and Communication at George Brown College in Toronto.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

Love ’em or hate ’em, student evaluations of teaching (SETs) are here to stay. Parts <a href="https://www.teachingprofessor.com/free-article/its-time-to-discuss-student-evaluations-bias-with-our-students-seriously/" target="_blank"...

Since January, I have led multiple faculty development sessions on generative AI for faculty at my university. Attitudes...
Does your class end with a bang or a whimper? Many of us spend a lot of time crafting...

Faculty have recently been bombarded with a dizzying array of apps, platforms, and other widgets that...

The rapid rise of livestream content development and consumption has been nothing short of remarkable. According to Ceci...

Feedback on performance has proven to be one of the most important influences on learning, but students consistently...

wpChatIcon

Online faculty often default to an essay assignment mindset when establishing the parameters for an online discussion. They require posts to be up to 500 words and to include several citations and other academic writing components, such as introductions, conclusions, and references.

But online discussion is not an essay exchange or a place to practice academic writing. It is a “discussion”: a forum for students to practice effective communication with peers and build on each other’s ideas and for teachers to foster student engagement in the online classroom. An academic writing format does not facilitate this type of exchange.

Just looking at an essay-length post on a discussion board is intimating. Large chunks of text are difficult to engage with, resulting in cognitive overload for students. And essays contain too many different ideas for students to respond to effectively. This can result in a glut of fragmented and superficial responses on a discussion board.

In the working world, we discuss issues online in emails, and email has its own format. Students learn the academic article format in higher education and texting format outside of class, but rarely are they taught the email format that will serve as the basis for their online discussions in the future. We serve our students better by leaving the academic format to essay assignments and instead teaching them to communicate using the email format in online discussion.

Effective emails focus on one topic, open with the main idea, and are designed to be read and responded to efficiently while also building rapport with their audience—all elements that can facilitate a more engaging and accessible online student discussion.

Thus, I decided to experiment with having students write in an email format for their online discussions. Adapted from Guffey et al.’s Essentials of Business Communication (2016), I now use the following email framework to guide students’ discussion posts in the online classroom:

Although further research needs be undertaken to support the efficacy of this framework, the result in my classroom been accessible discussions, high student engagement, and an opportunity to practice professional writing in a low-stakes environment.

Clear, concise, and respectful communication will always be a transferable skill for students, and what is most important is articulating those expectations to your class. Modeling and normalizing email-style exchanges on a discussion board can help create a more accessible forum for your online classroom while facilitating literacy practices that will not only follow students through their academic journey but also support them throughout their professional lives.

Reference

Guffey, M. E., Loewy, D., & Almonte, R. (2016). Essentials of business communication (9th Canadian ed.). Nelson Education.


Casey Gurfinkel is a communications professor in the Department of English and Communication at George Brown College in Toronto.