Online Teaching and Learning

A Professor’s Experience as a MOOC Learner

Supriya Sarnikar, associate professor in the Economics and Management Department at Westfield State University, enrolled in several MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) offered through Coursera for several reasons: personal enrichment, to learn of any pedagogical or technological innovations these courses offered, and to better understand

Read More »

How to Deal with Incivility in the Online Classroom

Incivility in the online classroom can take many forms. Angela Stone Schmidt, director of graduate programs in the School of Nursing and associate dean College of Nursing & Health Professions at Arkansas State University—Jonesboro, uses Morrisette’s definition: “interfering with a cooperative learning atmosphere.” So in

Read More »

Promoting Online Learner Success through Self-Regulation

Self-regulation—controlling the factors that affect one’s learning—is an important skill for online learners to possess. Course design that encourages metacognition can help online learners develop their ability to self-regulate. In an interview with Online Classroom, Maureen Andrade, associate vice president for academic programs at Utah

Read More »

Incorporating Active Learning into the Online Classroom

Gary Ackerman, director of the Center for Teaching and Learning at Mount Wachusett Community College, works with faculty to incorporate active learning into their online and face-to-face courses, and while there are differences in these learning environments, active learning can be implemented just as well

Read More »
Archives

Get the Latest Updates

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Magna Digital Library
wpChatIcon

When Washington University School of Law enlisted the help of 2U, Inc., (www.2u.com) to develop its online master of laws program, the challenge was to figure out how to make the Socratic case method work in an online environment.

Further complicating the challenge was the issue of scalability. It might be possible to engage a small group in synchronous session in a Socratic dialogue, but that approach would not work with hundreds of students enrolled in the program.

To solve this pedagogical puzzle, several faculty members and 2U instructional designers looked at a key assumption about the Socratic method—that it is highly interactive. It is highly interactive, but not for everyone all the time. “In a class of 100 students, at any given moment it's highly interactive for only one of those 100 students while the other 99 nervously await their turn,” says Ian Van Tuyl, 2U's chief content officer.

Although students benefit vicariously from the Socratic method when they are not active participants, the idea of simply recording an excellent Socratic dialogue would not be an adequate substitute for the face-to-face version in which students (at least occasionally) are active participants.

Bidirectional Learning Tool
Van Tuyl and his colleagues pursued the idea of devising a way to accomplish the Socratic case method asynchronously, but in a way that would have each student respond to the questions posed by the instructor.

They came up with the Bidirectional Learning Tool, a software system and production methodology that enables each student to respond at specific points in a recorded Socratic dialogue. Here's how this method plays out in the program: Two students and the instructor sit at a round table and engage in a Socratic dialogue. Three cameras record the discussion—one trained on each student and one trained on the instructor. The instructor engages the students in a spontaneous Socratic dialogue as in a face-to-face class. Then the instructor looks into the camera and poses a question to the student viewing the recording (e.g., “Online student, why is this case in federal court to begin with?”). At that point, the online student must respond to the question before the video can continue. Depending on the question, the instructor may require the student to respond via audio, video, text, or multiple-choice question.

Each student responds to each question without hearing or seeing the other students' responses. Once the case is over, students can have access to each other's responses to critique and perhaps vote on which they thought were the best answers.