Students must comply with lots of educational requirements. They take “required” general education and major courses. Sometimes the sequences of those courses is also mandated. In most courses students must submit required assignments on specified due dates. Policies mandate student actions, such as attendance, participation,
Online teachers generally assume that student discussion and collaboration should occur in a learning management system’s (LMS’s) discussion forum. But for certain uses, online whiteboards work better than the LMS due to their fundamentally different design.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, relatively few instructors had used web-based conferencing for teaching and learning. With the shift in the spring of 2020, many instructors suddenly found themselves teaching online courses, and many others found themselves teaching onsite with some students using videoconferencing to
“Student learning is remarkably complex . . .” So begins the second sentence of a lengthy article proposing a research-based conceptual framework that identifies cognitive challenges to learning and how teachers can respond to them. The framework rests on three premises:
A learning contract is a negotiated agreement in which a student develops an individualized learning plan with their instructor’s support. Learning contracts provide students with choice about how to complete class assignments within the framework of the course learning objectives (Knowles, 1986). There are five
Now that many of us have moved to a hybrid or online format, the conversation around student-to-content and student-to-student engagement has taken on a new level of significance and intention. We have developed a reading graphic organizer (RGO) that increases students’ reading comprehension, assesses their
As fall 2020 draws to a close, the reactions to remote learning are reverberating loudly. They include not only outrage and despondency but also gratefulness and appreciation. Student surveys taking the pulse of learning experiences look very much like the evaluations of teaching we in
During the pandemic the support we’ve received from and been able to offer to colleagues has offered a sliver of light during a season of darkness. We’ve had the joy of being there for each other. How could those of us teaching for the first
Dear Student,
Fall 2020 is in the books. How did it go?
Few residential students looked forward to the thought of another term of remote learning or socially distanced face-to-face classes. It is just not the same thing taking a class scattered around a large room, masked,
Why is online discussion worth discussing? For starters, many conversations about this unique form of interaction have centered on its merits. Is it better or worse than face-to-face discussion? As interesting as those conversations have been, what merits analysis now are the implications of those
Magna Publications © 2023 All rights reserved
Students must comply with lots of educational requirements. They take “required” general education and major courses. Sometimes the sequences of those courses is also mandated. In most courses students must submit required assignments on specified due dates. Policies mandate student actions, such as attendance, participation, and academic integrity.
For much of my career I’ve struggled with finding the balance between teacher requirements and student choice. It’s easy for teachers to make requirements. We have the power, and it’s largely unquestioned by students or those in the administration. Most educational requirements rest on good intentions and sound justifications. Many teacher mandates grow out of years of experience dealing with students. Those who come to class tend to do better than those who don’t. Assignments have deadlines because being late has consequences. It’s better for students to first experience professional requirements in courses instead of on the job.
Good intentions aside, some requirements exist for reasons that are hard to connect with learning. It’s the requirements that affect learning outcomes that cause my consternation, which was recently stirred by a study of clicker participation (Tang et al., 2020). The research questions were pretty straightforward:
The findings were consistent with a lot of previous research. The more frequent grading treatment raised participation rates and course grades more than the less frequent grading option. Students who preferred less participation evaluation were those with lower GPAs and self-control scores. They were also the students who benefited most when they participated in the more frequent grading treatment. But although the instructional intervention improved their performance, that didn’t make them any more likely to choose it.
When students don’t make good learning decisions, do they shoulder all the responsibility for those poor choices? What if they fulfill a requirement that improves their performance, but they don’t recognize the improvement or can’t identify the reasons for it? They know they got a better grade but can’t say why. I don’t think they’re totally off the hook, because learners should be metacognitively aware. Students need to be paying attention to themselves as learners. The related question is whether teachers have any responsibility to cultivate that learner awareness.
Most learners avoid what they don’t do well or think they don’t do well. So, reticent students refuse to volunteer and reluctantly respond when the teacher calls on them. Does requiring their participation decrease their reticence? The research doesn’t offer a clear answer, which probably means participation requirements develop confidence in some students but not others. That uneven effectiveness of requirements is typical and raises questions as to their short- and long-term impacts.
In the short term, in courses where grades are involved, most students comply with the requirements or appear to. Research on the effects of required attendance also offers mixed results. Attendance policies do get more students coming to class, but that doesn’t always translate into better course grades.
What happens when we make courses required? In case of general education, they become the courses students least want to take and teachers least like to teach. Most degree programs now require a full slate of courses, leaving little or no room for courses unrelated to the major. Universities offer a veritable buffet of courses, but most students are confined to the salad bar. More and more I question our ability to anticipate career-long knowledge needs. Given the rate at which new knowledge rolls over old, do we need to teach these large amounts of content? Would we be smarter to let students pursue more of their own knowledge interests?
What we mandate that students do merits our vigilant attention. The salient question remains the same: What are the effects of those requirements on learning—in the course, during college, and across the years that follow?
Tang, L., Li, S., Auden, E., & Dhuey, E. (2020). Who benefits from regular class participation? The Journal of Economic Education, 51(3–4), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1804502
