Love ’em or hate ’em, student evaluations of teaching (SETs) are here to stay. Parts <a href="https://www.teachingprofessor.com/free-article/its-time-to-discuss-student-evaluations-bias-with-our-students-seriously/" target="_blank"...
Students were given flexibility in how they presented their solutions, but were required to have their face, voice, and handwriting in the video at all times. The default method, which most students used most of the time, was to find (or purchase) a whiteboard and simply write out their solutions like a teacher would write out an example while using a video camera (often the webcam on their laptops or phones) to record the action. Although the course was online, many students lived on or near campus and went to the library or an empty classroom to make their videos. Other students bought inexpensive whiteboards and filmed themselves in their houses or apartments. Variations on this basic theme soon emerged. One student, for example, couldn't afford a whiteboard, so she taped a grid of blank sheets of paper to her wall and used a magic marker. Another student used software on his tablet that captured his handwriting while simultaneously capturing a video of him writing.The requirement of having one's face, voice, and handwriting in the frame addressed two issues. One was academic integrity; without all three elements present, the video could be faked. The other, more important reason was to give a human face and voice to the students in the class who otherwise would only know each other as names on a discussion board. As the course unfolded and the videos rolled in, we got to know each other through verbal styles, organizational tendencies, the decor of one person's living room, or the shape of another person's handwriting. The class began to be a learning community rather than a list of names. The video assignments in the course were an effective play on the structure around which the course was built. We used a flipped learning model in which students watched videos before class activities, and with these video assignments, students also contributed their own video material to the class, becoming producers rather than just consumers. This repository of video examples was available at any time, including during exams, so there was a social and academic incentive to make the video quality as high as possible. This assignment was so successful that it has been also implemented in some of our face-to-face classes. My colleague Shelly Smith has been using video assignments in her Calculus 2 classes with similarly positive effects. As we have continued to use video homework, we have surveyed students on their experiences with this assignment, and we've learned some surprising things:
Whatever the reasons, we see much more advancement in self-regulated learning behaviors in a handful of video assignments than we do in reams and reams of written assignments.
The concept of a video homework assignment like this is nothing new to many disciplines, such as languages and the fine arts. And there's no reason to believe that this form of assessment, in which the vital human relationship between student and their professors and students with each other is center stage, can't be successful in any discipline. It's an idea well worth pursuing.Robert Talbert is an associate professor of mathematics at Grand Valley State University.