One of the challenges online learners face is sustaining motivation over the duration of a course. In face-to-face classrooms, teachers can personalize motivational strategies to meet the needs of individual students, and the social presence of teachers and fellow learners provides its own motivational incentives. Online students, however, need to internalize motivational strategies that actively remind them of not only what they need to do to meet the course expectations but also why they are taking the course in the first place.
Studies
demonstrate the motivational power of setting goals (Hendel, 2017; Schunk,
2001) and writing them down and keeping track of them (Matthews, 2015). When
students identify specific personal or professional goals that have led them to
enroll in a particular course, these goals can help provide a motivational
framework that will support them through the challenges the coursework presents.
The motivational potential of goal-setting is further enhanced when students
are encouraged to write their goals down, share them with their classmates and
instructor, and reflect at regular intervals on their progress toward them
(Locke & Latham, 2006). While online classes may not allow for the
face-to-face contact that motivates many on-ground students, the discussion
board features in online learning platforms are ideal forums for students to
articulate their goals in writing, compare them with their classmates’ goals,
and reflect on their progress in meeting them.
I
build goal-setting into the curriculum of the online courses I teach and design
as a way of clarifying each student’s personal “stake” in the class. Over the
course of a semester, I embed three goal-oriented discussion thread questions
designed to (1) activate the students’ self-conscious awareness of their
learning goals, (2) facilitate midsemester reflection on these goals, and (3)
provide students at the end of the class with an opportunity to assess the
extent to which they have progressed toward their goals. This sustained
emphasis on students’ personal goals serves as a reminder that the content and
coursework associated with the class all serve a “higher purpose” and that, by
fulfilling the course requirements, they are also moving toward fulfilling
their own personal life projects.
In
the first week of class I invite students to introduce themselves by describing
the goals they hope to achieve in the course. I encourage them to identify
specific skills or bodies of information that they would like to master. Some
students define their goals narrowly—they want to learn how to write stronger
paragraphs or learn more about a certain topic—while other students identify
goals that are personal or even spiritual. I try to make room for a diversity
of goals, but I use the discussion board to (1) encourage students to craft
goal statements that are specific and realistic and (2) explain how the
assignments in the class will help them advance toward their goals. Discussing
these goals on the discussion board allows students to respond to one another’s
goals, which they typically do with supportive enthusiasm, borrowing goals from
one another, comparing goals, and providing practical ideas to one another
about strategies for achieving them. The students’ responses to one another’s
goals establish a shared ethos of collective effort, contributing to a richly
interpersonal learning environment.
Near
the course’s midpoint and sometimes as part of a midterm assignment, I ask
students to recall the goals they articulated in the first week and to comment
on whether or not they feel that they are making progress toward them. When
students report that they don’t feel they are meeting their goals, it can be a
chance to evaluate whether the problem lies in the goals or in the students’
approach to the coursework. By contrast, when students report that they are
making progress toward their goals, it is an opportunity to celebrate their
success and inspire them to continue their efforts. Often students will
reassess their goals in light of what they experienced during the first half of
the semester, and this evolution of their goals is itself important evidence of
genuine learning.
In
the final week of class, I use the discussion board to invite the students to
return once again to the goals they wrote about in week one. This discussion
provides a valuable opportunity for students to look back on the entire arc of
the course and to evaluate their experience in reference to their initial
goals. I ask them to think about how they can continue using what they’ve
learned in the course as the foundation for articulating and advancing toward
new and more ambitious goals. As a bonus, these conversations regularly give me
valuable insight into which elements of the course spark student achievement
and which elements of the class might be falling flat. These insights serve as regular
reminders of my ongoing goal to facilitate an online learning environment that
is engaging, responsive, and impactful.
A
similar, motivation-oriented sequence of assignments can be unobtrusively
incorporated into just about any online course in any discipline. Students who
remain mindful of their personal and professional goals are more likely to keep
up with their coursework and to sustain a clear sense of purpose as they do so.
References
Hendel, R. J. (2017). Supporting multiple modalities and universal design in learning with goal-setting. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 15(6), 25–30. Retrieved from http://www.iiisci.org/journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/IP029LL17.pdf
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
Matthews, G. (2015). The effectiveness of four coaching techniques in enhancing goal achievement: Writing goals, formulating action steps, making a commitment, and accountability. In G. T. Papanikos (Ed.), Psychology abstracts: Ninth annual international conference on psychology (p. 41). Athens, Greece: Athens Institute for Education and Research. Retrieved from https://www.atiner.gr/abstracts/2015ABST-PSY.pdf
Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulation through goal-setting. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED462671.pdf
Randy
Laist, PhD, is a professor of English at Goodwin College.